Monday, January 30, 2012

Cats & Dogs


One suggestion I got recently was to talk about the differences between cats and dogs as far as how they interact with each other, and how we as the humans in their lives interact with them.  Now, I think this individual wanted more me to discuss why cats rule and dogs drool, but I am going to take a different approach and examine the different ways in which each species is intelligent, and what those forms of intelligence mean to us.

I’ll start with dogs, then, because dogs are the species that we are most familiar with.  We, as humanity, have been befriending, working with, and selectively breeding dogs (from the grey wolf) for potentially as long as 30,000 years.  They are the first animal we domesticated, and the closest from day one.  Many scientists believe that humans actually nursed wolf cubs in the early years of domestication (from Grandin, T. 2005. Animals In Translation, an excellent book regarding comparative psychology and sociology).  It’s really little wonder, then, that today we feel much more at home with dog emotions, whether they have become more like us or we have become more like them.

The first and most obvious similarity is that we are both highly social animals, and rely very heavily on each other and social hierarchies.  Contrary to popular belief, dogs do not view their owners as “the alpha” – the pack mentality was bred out of them long ago, and we can see this today in the looseness and disorganization of feral dogs descended from domestic breeds.  They do, however, tend to put a great deal of stock in our happiness as individuals that they cherish, and retain a great deal of the social intelligence of their lupine ancestors.

Some of this intelligence is in their willingness to display how they are feeling in terms that we understand.  Dogs use facial expression well, including using their eyes.  Perhaps ironically, though, while they have little qualms about being embarrassed or making mistakes that impact them personally, they are more likely to inhibit themselves if they feel it necessary for the happiness or agreement of their enigmatic human companions.  I want to write a significantly creepier article on this later, but for now, this means simply that we as human beings must not fall into the hole created by the dog’s usual openness, and learn to read the more subdued cues they give, especially when they are uncomfortable.

I want to talk about cats more, because cats are far more mysterious – and they seem to like it this way, so I apologize to any cats whose veils I am preparing now to lift.  This desire to not show certain aspects of themselves, particularly anything that may make them appear weak, is pervasive across all breeds and species.  Perhaps the most famous and distressful example of this is that cats will seek complete solitude when they are dying.  Many cat owners, even those who have not lost a pet, are aware of this solace-seeking behaviour when kitty is ill; she will hide beneath or behind a piece of furniture and not come out for anything, even if she has had no prior experience with the veterinarian.  The etiology of this behaviour is pure instinct: a cat that is ill does not want to bare herself in the open as an easy target, and it is instinctive behaviour like this that often separates them from dogs.

Cats have been domesticated for a long time, but not nearly as long as dogs – only at most 9,500 years ago.  More importantly, we have never become partnered with cats – apart from, on occasion, using them as hunting partners, and even in combat, we have mostly just kept them around the grain bins and barns to keep away rodents.  We give them a place to stay and a nice source of bait for their food, and they keep that bait from being eaten by their food.  Only relatively recently, mostly since the late Bronze Age according to region, have we done much for keeping them as vanity pets and companions.  It’s therefore little wonder that they have much more for instinct, and we understand them far less than we do dogs.

However, one can learn cat.  While cats are still so well tied to their feral nature that they can even be expected to survive in the wild if abandoned, they do have some surprising social skills.  Although they are not nearly as tightly-knit as wolf packs, cats do form small social groups that are mainly for collective hunting and protection of queens and kittens.  Cats also have a huge range of communicative abilities, but there are two difficulties that we have in interpreting them.  Firstly, their base level is the way that dogs are when they are concerned with your reaction.  They keep their emotions tight to the belt in order to not appear weak, until they are needed.  In short, they are the opposite of dogs in their expressiveness.  Secondly, their ways of expressing themselves are much more foreign to humans: rather than using the direction of their gaze or ecstatic activity that are very easy for us to interpret, they use their ears, whiskers, tails, eyelids, and very minute tactile methods of communication that we simply are not very well-acquainted with.  Someday, perhaps, I will talk about these as well in more detail, but the simple fact is that unlike both dogs and humans, they put a great deal more stock in hearing, smell, and tactile information (ie whiskers) than they do sight, which leads to differing forms of communication.

Due to both the historical nature of our relationship, then, and our varying methods of communication that neither side has a great deal of ease in understanding, we tend to assume that cats are less amiable or even less intelligent than are dogs, which is not true and is merely a gross oversimplification of the differences in their respective psychologies.  The last number of posts I have made, I have left the reader with an overarching message to chew on until next week, and I believe this is a fine time for that: each animal genus and even species has its own idiosyncrasies, intelligences, and methods of communication, and all are deserving of respect and striving towards understanding, even (especially) if we need to leave behind our human mindset.

6 comments:

  1. Well there certainly could have been more dog hate in this piece, but I SUPPOSE I'll live. :P

    I actually don't hate dogs, just...certain kinds. For example, anything under 70 lbs I refuse to acknowledge in a friendly manner, unless it proves itself otherwise as usually all the smaller breeds I meet (and labs) are hyperactive, yappy, little sacks o' fur.

    *ahem*

    However, I do grudgingly agree with "...each animal genus and even species has its own idiosyncrasies, intelligences, and methods of communication, and all are deserving of respect and striving towards understanding...".

    So now for further commentary and what-have-you:

    "(from the grey wolf)"

    Yes, that one little factoid there. It pisses me to hell and back when people assume domesticated dogs were not bred from wolves. I had a class a while back in which people were talking about how they'd shoot my dogs because they chase deer, and when I pointed out that it's instinct, they all tried arguing it. Idiots.

    "...they are more likely to inhibit themselves if they feel it necessary for the happiness or agreement of their enigmatic human companions."

    Honestly, I can't quite tell what you're saying here, I think. Do you mean that the dog may "mess up" to please someone, or to make them feel better? I feel like I'm not reading it right. XD

    "...using them as hunting partners, and even in combat..."

    I honestly never knew or even thought of this. And I can't tell which one of the two seems harder to convince a cat to do.... heh

    "Secondly, their ways of expressing themselves are much more foreign to humans..."

    Well I knew this to be true simply from having cats and observing them and such, I've recently noticed a prime example: the head rub. One of our cats will come up to me and nuzzle my face with his or her head, and purr. Fair enough; so I do it back. Well depending on which part of my face I use and where on them I nuzzle, they give somewhat varied reactions. One in particular, without fail, will shy away a bit if I use my chin or cheek, but purrs louder if I use my nose. So I'm slowly (very, very, very, very, very slowly) learning.

    "...we tend to assume that cats are less amiable or even less intelligent than are dogs..."

    As you probably know, I don't think that way at all. :P My way of thinking is that yes, dogs are easier to train, but that's because they have more of a blind loyalty, whereas cats think about things. Not entirely accurate, I know, but that's how I see it with our dog(s) a lot.

    A good article, and another fine read, my friend. I look forward to more, and I apologize if Skyrim continues to prolong my response times in the future. :P

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Animals hunting deer is a fine thing. Deer are overpopulated in a number of reasons due to people hunting their predators at a more significant rate than the deer themselves.

      What I meant by dogs inhibiting themselves is their emotions. If they believe we will dislike it, particularly if they are afraid of our reaction to their reacting negatively to something, they will inhibit that emotional response. For instance, if you shout at your dog whenever he whines to go outside, he is less likely to do so, even perhaps to the point of damaging his health if he needs to urinate but holds it to avoid that reaction from you. Cats don't really do this, and in my experience if anything are more likely to seek vengeance for such things.

      When dealing with cats, we have always relied heavily on their own instincts rather than attempting to train them. Cats have been used, though, to hunt small animals (rodents, mustelids, birds), and there is a record (whose source I can't recall at the moment, so I suppose you'll just have to take my word for it) of Germanic warriors going into battle with cats on their shoulders, who would claw people at the side from their lofty position.

      Aye, tactile communication is far, far more important for cats than it is for either humans or dogs. A lot of the time people will become very confused when they are petting their cat, who is obviously enjoying it, and then suddenly the cat will lash out. This is almost always because of what seems to a human to be an almost imperceptible change in the location or manner of the petting that was either uncomfortable or communicating something negative to the cat. I do plan to talk about this sort of thing more in the future.

      Thanks for the well-thought-out response.

      Delete
  2. Around here people (hunters, mainly), are getting pissed because the DNR wanted to get the wolf population back on its feet. And now they've grown beyond expectations and are "over hunting the deer".

    So basically the hunters are pissed because nature's kicking their asses. Again.

    And in regards to the dog inhibition thing, thanks for clearing that up. Not sure how I didn't see that before, but oh well. XD

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The thing about carnivore populations is that they cannot be overpopulated by definition, because unlike with herbivores, their food is rather difficult to find and acquire. As soon as they start to become too much for the prey species, the dwindling populations of prey will have a negative impact on the population of the predators, allowing the prey to recover and the two populations to balance out. Not 100% relevant, but chances are ignorance of this relationship is driving the opinions of your hunter friends.

      No problem for clearing up the bit about dogs. It's very unfortunate that it isn't common knowledge, but there you are.

      Delete
  3. I would love to hear more specifics about cat behavior. :>

    As for the content of this post, I've had both dogs and cats and I definitely recognize the difference in their behaviors. Dogs always seemed easy to get and they seemed to get be better as well; cats were rather distant and did their own thing. I like how you related their retention of instincts to their length of domestication and you made me realize just how true it is that cats got the short end of the stick on getting all buddy-buddy with people. We should've started with big cats, first. :(

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I wonder what would have happened if we had tamed, say, leopards rather than wolves. It would have been a good deal more difficult because wolves are naturally social, but human selection is an incredibly powerful force.

      Delete